Search
Close this search box.

Air Force tests chemical vapor protection on AC-130J gunship at Hurlburt Field

Next Generation Aircrew Protection team evaluates aircraft chemical defense systems and tests vapor purge capabilities on special operations gunship during six-month program at Hurlburt Field.
A 4th Special Operations Maintenance Squadron Airman directs a 4th Special Operations Squadron AC-130J Ghostrider gunship, as it prepares to taxi at Hurlburt Field, Florida, Dec. 4, 2024. The aircraft was used in a Next Generation Aircrew Protection team test to evaluate the effectiveness of chemical stimulant vapor purge systems during flight. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman Samantha Rossi)

The Next Generation Aircrew Protection team has completed a six-month vapor purge testing program on an AC-130J Ghostrider gunship, marking a shift toward evaluating mobility aircraft for chemical defense capabilities.

  • The testing, conducted from June 24 to December 6, 2024, assessed how quickly the aircraft could purge harmful chemical vapors and evaluated the effectiveness of standard aircraft systems in protecting aircrews during chemical vapor attacks.

“With the evolving and ever-changing war environment, testing how quickly vapor can be purged from an aircraft, and how protective non-CBRN equipment can be is a key asset to every element of the Department of Defense,” said Justin Sperling, an NGAP test engineer. “This includes our special operators.”

The process involves a pre-flight spray application, followed by installing sensors inside the aircraft. NGAP team members monitor simulant vapor levels until reaching a target concentration. Data collection continues during flight as the aircraft purges the simulant.

The Next Generation Aircrew Protection team performs a chemical simulant spray test on a 4th Special Operations Squadron AC-130J Ghostrider gunship at Hurlburt Field, Florida, Dec. 4, 2024. The test evaluates an aircraft’s ability to purge chemical vapors during flight, ensuring aircrew safety and optimal performance. (U.S. Air Force photo by Airman Samantha Rossi)

While NGAP has historically focused on fighter and bomber aircraft, the AC-130J testing represents an expansion into mobility aircraft evaluation. Lt. Michael Rossi, Lead Joint CBRN Aircrew Protection Engineer at the Air Force CBRN Defense Systems Branch, noted the significance of Air Force Special Operations Command’s involvement.

  • “Air Force Special Operations Command is known for being the first to jump at innovative tactics, and working with the NGAP team was no exception,” Rossi said. “This directly contributes to development of next-generation equipment and feeds into new concepts of legacy equipment.”

The collected data will be published in a report on the Defense Technical Information Center, informing the development of Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear protective gear and aircrew guidelines across the Department of Defense.

“Without this information, we would have to rely on older assumptions that aren’t representative of what the threat is today,” Rossi said. “This information is helpful to AFSOC because it helps accurately plan for their CBRN operations.”

The testing helps determine when aircrews can safely remove chemical protective gear during attacks, reducing equipment burden while maintaining mission focus, according to Sperling.

Join the conversation...

Continue reading 👇

Community Comments

“Automated speeding cameras to issue tickets should be illegal. The only people who benefit are the people collecting the money. The citizens of Fort Walton Beach need to vote those...”
Respond
“Traffic enforcement in FWB is nonexistent and needs to become a priority. For example, almost every day I turn off highway 98 into the Veteran’s Park parking lot. My wife...”
Respond
“Elevating US98, like they did with US19 (N/S) is a much better idea than DESTROYING our historic downtown.”
Respond
“Who do you talk to for that? I would like to see a no u-turn sign at the left turn lane from Mary Esther to Wright Pkwy.”
Respond
“Tear down which Buildings on the south side of 98?”
Respond
“I hope no circumstances ever exist which require me ever to live a n Okaloosa county. You seem like a bunch of peaches.”
Respond
“Elevate HWY 98 just like Interstate 110 is in Pensacola and just like HWY 98 is at the Andrew's Bridge in Panama City. That moves traffic as well as keeps...”
Respond
“You sound like a communist plant pushing for total surveillance… We don’t need cameras everywhere”
Respond
“Maryland and Washington DC are examples of what not to do…”
Respond

GET OUR FREE LOCAL NEWSLETTER

Get the weekday email that actually makes reading local news enjoyable again.