Search
Close this search box.

Okaloosa takes next step on pay-to-park exploration; free parking for residents to remain

Commissioners approved a procurement committee to continue advancing the proposal. Free parking for county residents remains among the guard rails the board has set if a program is adopted.

Okaloosa County Commissioners voted unanimously on June 16 to approve a special selection committee that will oversee procurement for the county’s planned pay-to-park program, advancing a process first endorsed by the board in January.

  • The staff document emphasized that all previously approved guard rails remain in place, including free parking for county residents.

Other guard rails set in January call for likely reduced or eliminated fees during winter months from November through February, a revenue-sharing arrangement with the vendor rather than significant upfront capital investment by the county, and no long-term contract lock-in.

Chairman Trey Goodwin said any resident verification system should use modern technology rather than physical stickers.

“I don’t think people need stickers on their cars. That’s old technology,” Goodwin said. “There’s ways to do this in a much more efficient way.”

Goodwin said a verification system could allow residents to tap their phone at a location to confirm their identity through an account, eliminating the need for any fee.

The pay-to-park process was unanimously approved at the Jan. 20, 2026 commission meeting. Staff initially planned to piggyback on existing agreements held by two vendors already operating in the community but were advised by legal counsel to issue a full procurement. The county will now issue an Invitation to Negotiate for pay-to-park services at locations to be outlined in the scope of work.

  • Locations previously identified as potential test sites include Beach Access Lots 1 through 7 on Okaloosa Island, Beasley Park, and boat launch parking at Marler Park and Cinco Bayou. 

The county says pay-to-park is a potential alternative revenue source in light of a constitutional amendment on property taxes proposed by the state legislature. Revenue from the program is intended to fund capital improvements and maintenance of park and recreational facilities and could potentially lower the park MSTU rate.

The four-member procurement committee approved by the board includes Coffey, Deputy Director of Facilities and Parks Amanda Maxwell, Deputy TDD Director of Financial and Compliance Charlotte Dunsworth, and IT Deputy Director Hans Steinke.

Commissioner Paul Mixon moved to approve the item as presented.

“This action is just to approve the special selection committee,” Mixon said. “There’s still things that will take place. We’ve had much discussion into this. I think a lot of the points that were brought up have previously been discussed.”

Commissioner Drew Palmer seconded the motion and reinforced that the program is not intended to charge local residents to park at local parks.

  • “The intent is never to make locals pay for parking at local parks, and it does affect the whole county,” Palmer said.

Commissioner Sherri Cox had initially moved to table the item in deference to Commissioner Carolyn Ketchel, who was absent and in whose district the affected county assets sit. The motion failed for lack of a second, and Cox joined the rest of the board in voting to approve.

Goodwin used the discussion to address public criticism of the program, including a comment from an earlier speaker who characterized the fees as a tax.

“It’s actually the antithesis of a tax. It’s a user fee,” Goodwin said. “It’s not applied to people without their willing participation. It is a fee that would be assigned to a convenience that someone may take the option to use or not use.”

Goodwin said revenue generation is secondary to other goals of the program. He said the system would help identify and deter illegal commercial pontoon rental operations that he said currently use public boat ramps.

“Our boat ramps are frequently inundated with illegal pontoon operators, and this will help stop that,” Goodwin said. “Those illegal pontoon operations, not only do they abuse the public asset, they also create a danger to the public.”

PROMOTION

6 Responses

  1. Why isn’t the money from the tourism “bed tax” used for beach access parking upkeep? Instead of using tax revenue for new projects use it for existing infrastructure. I am completely against these parking fees! The reason we chose FWB over Destin years ago as our home was because of the free beach access! Once these fees are enacted, they only get more restrictive and expensive for residents!

  2. Can you tell me how to acquire the necessary parking designation as an Okaloosa resident?

  3. Sadly, the Pay to Park initiative has been approved for the (7) Okaloosa Island Beach Accessways. I say sadly because these fees will result in predictable, yet most unfortunate consequences for those of us Okaloosa County residents who live in the single-family neighborhoods on Okaloosa Island.

    Specifically, (6) of the (7) Beach Accessways are located across the street from the County B-1 zoned “Private Residential Areas,” and we will suffer from a barrage of visitors seeking to avoid parking fees by turning our small quiet residential streets into free public parking lots. I strongly encourage the BCC and this committee develop quality of life protections for County residents who will suffer the most for the County’s desire to increase revenues.

  4. Being a true native born and raised here sure would be nice to have somebody that is a native on the committee. It sure is funny that the property on the east side of Destin Bridge was purchased the property on the east side of the Shalamar Bridge was purchased the property on the west side of Cinco. Bridge was purchased. The old red lobster was purchased. and now all of a sudden you wanna start charging fees when you can’t even maintain the public access points at airman’s Princess Beach and Matterhorn Beach that are in such disarray. Let me be on the committee. I’d be happy to join.

  5. I am the owner of a Short Term Rental condo. I purchased my property 26 years ago, so I’m a very Long Term Property owner in Okaloosa County. I understand the preferred process of applying fees and increased taxes to visitors of Okaloosa County. However, I strongly urge this committee to reconsider this pay to park fee. The practice of always “sticking it to the vacationers” has turned many potential visitors away from Destin. Check with the county tax assessor, rentals have dropped considerably the last several years. Tourists are simply choosing other areas to visit and spend their money. As a Fort Walton Beach property owner commented in this group they chose not to be in Okaloosa County because of all the fees and increasing taxes. The same is happening with tourists. Property owners like me have been selling and moving out for several seasons now. I quote PT Bailey “A sucker is born every minute” is not a good policy for operating a major vacation site in the country. Greed is rampant in Okaloosa County.
    Before you sneer at my comments, consider where would Okaloosa County’s finances and employment rates be without the thousands of STR‘s many consider a burden and nuisance?

Join the conversation...

Continue reading 👇

Community Comments

“Interesting. Had a life saving stent done at that hospital after a major heart attack. Was about to go to Houston VA hospital cause I heard about new procedures they...”
Respond
“Mary, I first thought the same as you about the background but when I went back and looked in the settings you can change the background to any color you...”
Respond
“This is the worst thing yet. Did anyone ever think about the color of the background? This was not fun, and relaxing! It was irritating and frustrating. Made me think...”
Respond
“The Kiwanis Club of Niceville-Valparaiso is really excited to see the park completed and put to use. We know of at least one family from Freeport who will be traveling...”
Respond
Scott Schaeffler commented on WordroW: July 17, 2026
“0:56, 4 attempts”
Respond
“Susan, pretty much none of that is true. Have you calculated the difference for you personally between current taxes and then with the additional homestead exemption but with additional sales...”
Respond
“This is like taking from Peter to pay Paul. Taxes are already 7%, this will make them 8%. People think about if you have to buy a big ticket item?...”
Respond
“Who is doing the work and why didn't they put up screen to protect our natural water stream from getting all the sand, clay, trash, and who knows what else...”
Respond

GET OUR FREE LOCAL NEWSLETTER

Get the weekday email that actually makes reading local news enjoyable again.