Search
Close this search box.

Destin beach bonfire proposal fails to move forward

Motion to allow bonfires on private beaches fails for lack of second as residents express opposition over enforcement concerns.
Pexels

The Destin City Council rejected a proposal Monday night to allow beach bonfires on private property after a public hearing where residents voiced strong opposition to the plan.

  • Councilman Kevin Schmidt made a motion to direct city staff to draft an ordinance allowing beach bonfires on private property, but the motion failed when no other council member provided a second.

City Manager Larry Jones presented detailed regulations modeled after Walton County’s successful bonfire program, which generated $936,000 in revenue split between the county and fire district in fiscal year 2024. Jones said Destin would not see anywhere near that level of revenue.

“No way is that going to be a reality in the City of Destin,” Jones said. “But there is some magnitude there that shows there’s some demand for fires.”

Jones recommended limiting bonfires to private property only, saying public beaches are too narrow to accommodate both fires and other beachgoers.

  • “I think it would be unfair to have a 60 foot wide public access and have someone go build a fire at dusk and say nobody else can come to the beach tonight, because that’s basically what would happen,” Jones said.

The proposed regulations would have required fires to be placed in containers no larger than four feet in diameter, positioned at least four inches off the ground, with flames no higher than four feet. Fires would need to be at least 25 feet from property lines, 100 feet from inhabitable structures, and 200 feet from sea turtle nests.

All bonfire materials would need to be hand-carried to the site, and operators would be required to obtain permits through the Destin Fire Control District at a cost of $105.

During the public hearing, residents who spoke were opposed to the proposal, citing concerns about inadequate code enforcement, potential environmental damage to beaches, and the city’s limited coastline compared to Walton County’s 26 miles of beach. Speakers questioned whether the city could properly monitor compliance and worried about visitors ignoring regulations.

After the motion failed, Schmidt expressed frustration that only opponents spoke during the public hearing.

“So the business owners, the residents, the people that did talk in favor of it, nobody cares anything about them,” Schmidt said.

The council took no further action on the bonfire proposal.

PROMOTION

Join the conversation...

Continue reading 👇

Community Comments

Scott Schaeffler commented on WordroW: August 7, 2026
“1:53, 6 attempts”
Respond
“If you look back to the Commissioners South meeting in August last year Mr.Maddox brought a one year PAWS contract for a vote. He said PAWS admits they may not...”
Respond
“We have been told the water is unsafe. When will the residents be told the cause of this sudden water pollutions? Any updates or information?”
Respond
“When will they learn you cannot outrun a cops radio”
Respond
“The county has to find the $$ somewhere, just like everyone else. Every thing is so expensive bc of the pointless Iran War, tariffs, and other emotional economic policies driving...”
Respond
“Groc makes a lot of sense. I hope the water tests confirm this theory, but How do we fix the hypoxic / anoxic water problem ?? Do we need to...”
Respond
“I am relieved to learn that this sad event is being responded to. Out here in Joe’s Bayou, I have reported smaller oil or fuel spills from vessels. The reaction...”
Respond
“This is what Grok says: A hypoxic/anoxic (low- or no-oxygen) event in the water column and/or sediments, producing toxic hydrogen sulfide (H₂S, the classic rotten-egg/sulfur smell) via sulfate-reducing bacteria. This...”
Respond
“Picture looks like a poo slide to me :-)”
Respond

GET OUR FREE LOCAL NEWSLETTER

Get the weekday email that actually makes reading local news enjoyable again.